The Ancient History Thread Off Topic Homosexuality Debate.

Unless they're killed for it.

Which is murder and would be illegal in modern society even if those Pagan beliefs were allowed.

Haha I was just making a joke. But there is no reason to be call homosexuality a sin considering the fact that it has been around for so long and so far it does not seem to have to destroyed anything. In fact many great and celebrated people are considered to be homosexual

Mod Edit: Merged double post. - Chelsea

I actually go to a catholic school (Which ironically makes me want to be less Catholic) but I agree. Those teachings were made for people a long time ago. We need to make them more relevant while keeping the base teachings

Please no double posting, use the edit button.

double posting?

Double posting i miss what i did

It's posting twice in a row without anyone posting in between. I deleted the double post and edited it into your first post.

I'm sorry I thought there was a post in between. My mistake.

I didn't see it if there was but no harm done.

I guess no one wants to argue with me anymore sad face.

I'll argue with you

Whats the topic at hand?

True, although I've heard several cases of people seeking others to eat over the internet or something. There have been such agreements. Would it be legal in those cases? I don't think it is, and they were prosecuted for it, if I remember.

Which basically proves my original point of when something predates Christianity (like homosexuality) doesn't mean it should be accepted.

nah its not bad, Life choices are really not any of our business, so I think we should respect other peoples choices.

That's not what I'm saying though. I am saying that people are saying that it somehow harms society but the fact that it has little negative impact on history (other than when catholic priest do things they shouldn't with choir boys) and it has been around for a such a long time proves that A. it is not harmful and B. that it should be accepted

Both genders and straight, bi and homosexual people have raped people. If that is used as an argument against homosexuality ever (not saying you are) then you may as well argue against being straight too.

Yeah rape has no place in the argument.

Ok even without that the argument is still valid

I know I just wanted to say something.

Not really. In theory, it could work, but the human brain and body can only survive for so long on so little food before they go insane from nutrition deprivation and starvation.

Ban straight people they rape kids.

Ban people! People suck!