I'm not... Does having 7 different endings that you get affected by what you've done in me3 and your karma, while still allowing Bioware to reasonably wrap up the series ruin everything? Which part of the ending did you not like?
How on earth could Shepard have possibly survived the scenario, no matter what choice he makes, he's stuck on an exploding citadel after having been wounded to the point where he's basically crawling around. Playing as a "good" character, I'm comfortable with 2/3 options I had.
I'm a bit pissed that because I don't have access to multiplayer, I couldn't unlock any of the "good" ending scenarios. All in all though, I was happy with my experience
I don't care if Shepherd lives or dies, but the fact that they don't wrap up anything pisses me off. What happens to earth or galaxy after it? Or what about all my companions? Were are the effects of the choices I made trough out the trilogy? And allot more unanswered questions.
Let's see, in the ones where the infantry squad survives and the reapers either blow up or fly away we can assume earth lives. In the one where everyone dies... Well everyone dies. In terms of squad mates, the video cuts out before that part, but depending on your readiness it shows you if your squadmates live or die.
The one quib I had with that is in my ending I was using Garus during the final assault and yet somehow he was magically transferred onto the Normandy in time for the final cutscene with Joker and Edi. And how does that not wrap it up? The effect was you either saved this cycle, ended the conflict by synthesizing a new form of life, or used the reapers to presumably assure humanity's dominance.
The major flaw with the LOTR ending was it spent 18 different other endings to try and say "oh look at all this stuff that happened after the main battle". All of those actions were assumed to take place so long as Sauron was defeated, and yet Peter Jackson chose to waste 40 minutes of my life with like 18 additional endings. Similar case here.
Depending on the choices you make there are assumptions of what happens after the trilogy. What happens to your squadmates after is really inconsequential considering you either saved or destroyed the galaxy. It sounds like you just didn't want the thing to end, rather then being disappointed in the finality of the ending.
No, I'm suggesting the key point of the ending was finality and that wasn't what you were looking for. The ending wasn't incomplete, it just didn't meet your expectations of what an ending should be. Not ever game has to have a wrap it up ending like Fallout
I think they delivered on that. Everything was wrapped up. If they had done a Fallout style, epilogue with all of your squad mates thing it would have just opened up the door to life after the battle. The point of the battle was that it decided everything which it did. The only reason to go beyond that would just be to make room for a sequel
No, they left it so open ended for a sequel or a DLC. And what did they wrap up? We defeated reapers and..? Where's all my choices I made trough out the trilogy? There's none. What happens to my squad mates? Or earth? How can you possibly justify leaving all that from a story driven trilogy?
Also you are in a minority, in a most popular poll on ME3 web site only 4% of people were satisfied with the ending. This does not make 96% automatically right, but it's something to consider.
Comments on Profile Post by pedro3131