Pouty mouth. Collar bones too prominent. Nose is 1% too large and wide. Top was not pulled up high enough. Low room ceiling. Ugly door frame. Extremely large right ear lobe. 1.5/10 Would not fuck. I am serious about the last one though, what the hell is going on there? Seriously? They don't have to be big at all. As long as they're there, full, even, and perky, I don't discriminate. I don't even prefer larger breasts, there is a wide range with which I would be 100% content with.
Maybe I'm the only one in this forum with depth perception but those are pretty average tits, you guys need to get a grip on reality .
Hmm I do say, I have attended 100 colleges and I still do not understand what this whole " reccesion " all those protestors outside of wallstreet are talking about.
Nope. That's just a bullshit way to present her nipples. However, if our God, Chelsea366 had a pair of those, that would be fine.
When did she invite people to flirt with her? She's bisexual, so it makes sense that she would join in on the conversation. The minute a woman participates in on a conversation that is remotely sexual, she is a 'Slut'. Fucking sexism.
Considering the post he was replying to, and that he hates chelsea, I'd say that it was directed at her. Of course he will deny this now, but the truth is he's a sexist. Above post ^
